1. Yes; it is a frivolous lawsuit. The man is obviously not permanently injured from the car crash, so he has no case. He wouldn't have had the ability to push a rock of that size with the disabilities he was claiming to have.
2. I do believe they should be charged with destruction of property. That landmark was a part of a national park, which means the government has a right to protect it against the actions of people like those men.
No comments:
Post a Comment